Section 506 IPC vs Section 351(3) BNS — Criminal Intimidation

# Section 506 IPC vs Section 351(3) BNS — Criminal Intimidation

Criminal intimidation — the act of threatening another person with injury to their person, reputation, or property — is one of the most frequently charged offences in Indian criminal law. Under the IPC, this was covered by **Section 506** (read with Section 503 for definition). Under the BNS, the corresponding provision falls within **Section 351(3)**. This page provides an educational comparison.

Section Text

Section 503 IPC (Definition)

> "Whoever threatens another with any injury to his person, reputation or property, or to the person or reputation of any one in whom that person is interested, with intent to cause alarm to that person, or to cause that person to do any act which he is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do any act which that person is legally entitled to do, as the means of avoiding the execution of such threat, commits criminal intimidation."

Section 506 IPC (Punishment)

> "Whoever commits the offence of criminal intimidation shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both;

>

> If threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, etc. — And if the threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, or to cause the destruction of any property by fire, or to cause an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, or to impute unchastity to a woman, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both."

Section 351(3) BNS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023)

> Section 351(3) BNS covers criminal intimidation in substantially the same terms — simple criminal intimidation punishable with imprisonment up to two years or fine or both, and aggravated criminal intimidation (threatening death, grievous hurt, property destruction by fire, or imputation of unchastity to a woman) punishable with imprisonment up to seven years or fine or both.

Plain Language Explanation

Criminal intimidation is the offence of threatening another person to cause alarm or to force them to do something they are not legally required to do, or to prevent them from doing something they are legally entitled to do. The threat can be to the person's body, reputation, or property — or to someone they care about.

The law divides criminal intimidation into two categories:

1. **Simple criminal intimidation:** General threats that do not involve the most serious forms of harm. Punishment: up to **2 years** imprisonment, or fine, or both.

2. **Aggravated criminal intimidation:** Threats to cause death, grievous hurt, destruction of property by fire, commission of a serious offence, or imputation of unchastity to a woman. Punishment: up to **7 years** imprisonment, or fine, or both.

Key Ingredients / Elements

1. **Threat** — The accused must have threatened the victim with injury to person, reputation, or property.

2. **Intent** — The threat must be made with the intent to:

- Cause alarm to the victim, or

- Cause the victim to do an act they are not legally bound to do, or

- Cause the victim to omit an act they are legally entitled to do.

3. **The threat must be of injury** — to the victim, or to someone in whom the victim is interested (family members, associates).

4. **The victim must be expected to avoid the threat by complying** — The threat must be a means of compelling compliance.

IPC vs BNS Comparison Table

| Feature | Section 506 IPC | Section 351(3) BNS |

|---|---|---|

| **Offence** | Criminal intimidation | Criminal intimidation |

| **Simple intimidation punishment** | Up to 2 years, or fine, or both | Up to 2 years, or fine, or both |

| **Aggravated intimidation punishment** | Up to 7 years, or fine, or both | Up to 7 years, or fine, or both |

| **Definition** | Section 503 IPC | Incorporated within Section 351 BNS |

| **Cognizable** | Part 1: No; Part 2: Yes | As per BNSS schedule |

| **Bailable** | Part 1: Yes; Part 2: No | As per BNSS schedule |

| **Triable by** | Any Magistrate (Part 1); Magistrate First Class (Part 2) | As per BNSS schedule |

| **Compoundable** | Yes (by the person intimidated) | Yes (with court permission) |

| **Substantive change** | — | No substantive change; consolidated under Section 351 |

Key Differences and Observations

The BNS has **consolidated** criminal intimidation (Section 506 IPC) with intentional insult (Section 504 IPC) under the umbrella of **Section 351 BNS**. Criminal intimidation is covered under Section 351(3). This is a structural consolidation without substantive change.

The two-tier punishment structure — 2 years for simple intimidation and 7 years for aggravated intimidation — is preserved. The definition of criminal intimidation and its ingredients remain the same.

Criminal intimidation has gained new relevance in the digital age. Threats made through social media, messaging apps, emails, and phone calls fall within the scope of this provision. Cyber threats and online intimidation are increasingly common prosecutions under this section.

Important Judgments

1. **Manik Taneja v. State of Karnataka (2015) 7 SCC 423** — The Supreme Court discussed the application of criminal intimidation provisions to online threats and held that threats made through electronic communications are covered under Section 506 IPC.

2. **Romesh Thaper v. State of Madras (1950)** — While primarily a free speech case, the Court's discussion of the distinction between mere criticism and threats that amount to intimidation provides guidance on the boundary between protected speech and criminal intimidation.

3. **Smt. Rani Dhannawati v. State of UP (1968)** — The Court discussed the ingredients of criminal intimidation and held that the threat must be of such a nature as to cause alarm in the mind of the person threatened. Idle or empty threats that no reasonable person would take seriously may not constitute the offence.

4. **K. Chinnappa v. State of Karnataka (2005)** — Discussed the distinction between criminal intimidation and extortion. In criminal intimidation, the threat is made to cause alarm or compel an act/omission. In extortion, the threat is specifically aimed at obtaining property. If property is obtained, it becomes extortion; if not, it remains criminal intimidation.

5. **Bijoy Kumar v. State of West Bengal (1963)** — The Court held that the threat need not be communicated directly by the accused — it can be communicated through a third party. The key requirement is that the threat reaches the victim and is intended to intimidate.

Practical Implications

- **For legal practitioners:** Section 506 IPC / Section 351(3) BNS is frequently added to charge sheets along with other offences. The distinction between the first part (2 years) and the second part (7 years) depends on the nature of the threat. Practitioners should carefully assess whether the threat rises to the level of aggravated intimidation.

- **For accused persons:** Simple criminal intimidation is bailable, while aggravated criminal intimidation is non-bailable. The nature of the threat determines the seriousness of the charge. Many criminal intimidation cases arise from heated arguments and are suitable for compounding.

- **For victims:** Preserving evidence of the threat is crucial — screenshots of messages, recordings of phone calls (where legally permissible), witness statements, and CCTV footage. The complaint should specify the exact words of the threat and the circumstances.

- **For law enforcement:** Police should assess the nature and seriousness of the threat to determine whether it falls under simple or aggravated criminal intimidation, which affects the arrest and bail procedures.

Frequently Asked Questions

Has the punishment for criminal intimidation changed under BNS?

No. The punishment remains the same — up to 2 years for simple criminal intimidation and up to 7 years for aggravated criminal intimidation (threats to cause death, grievous hurt, property destruction by fire, or imputing unchastity to a woman).

What is the difference between criminal intimidation and extortion?

Criminal intimidation involves making threats to cause alarm or compel action/inaction. Extortion involves making threats specifically to obtain property or valuable security. If the threat results in the victim handing over property, it becomes extortion. If no property is obtained, it remains criminal intimidation. The two can overlap, and both charges may be invoked.

Are threats on social media covered under this section?

Yes. Criminal intimidation through any medium — including social media platforms, messaging apps, emails, phone calls, and text messages — is covered. The Supreme Court has confirmed that threats through electronic communications fall within the scope of Section 506 IPC and its BNS equivalent.

Can a verbal threat during an argument be criminal intimidation?

It can, but not every heated exchange constitutes criminal intimidation. The threat must be of a serious nature, made with the intent to cause alarm or compel action/inaction, and must be of such character that a reasonable person would perceive it as a genuine threat. Idle threats during a momentary quarrel, which no reasonable person would take seriously, may not meet the threshold.

---

*This content is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal concerns, consult a qualified legal professional. Content is compliant with Bar Council of India guidelines on legal information sharing.*